A fuzzy model for evaluating risk impacts on variability between contract sum and final account in government-funded construction projects

Ernest Effah Ameyaw, Albert Chan PC, De-Graft Owusu-Manu, Ekow Coleman

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

18 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Purpose
– The purpose of this paper is to identify and then evaluate perceived risk factors influencing variability between contract sum and final count, and to develop a fuzzy risk assessment model for evaluating the overall impact of established critical risk factors impacting on variability between contract sum and final account in government-funded construction projects. Construction projects are characterised by risk factors that significantly impact on variability between the contract sum and final account.

Design/methodology/approach
– A research approach integrating questionnaire survey, mean scoring ranking and principal component factor analysis (PCFA) methods was adopted to evaluate and classify the critical risk factors. A fuzzy synthetic evaluation method was sequentially applied to compute the overall risk impact (ORI) of eight critical risk factors’ impact on variability between contract sum and final account.

Findings
– Initial results showed that eight critical risk factors have high impact on variations between contract sum and final account, namely (in order): project funding problems, underestimation of quantities, variations by client, change in scope of works, inadequate specification, change in design by client, defects in design and unexpected site (ground) conditions. PCFA produced two factor solutions: “professional-related factors” and “client factors”. The fuzzy model further showed that the ORI is 5.48, indicating that these risk factors have a high impact on variability between contract sum and final account in public construction projects. The client factors have a very high impact (5.59), while the professional-related factors indicated a high impact (5.41) on project cost variability.

Originality/value
– A practical model is proposed to evaluate the key risks associated with cost overruns in public projects. By giving effective and sustained attention to these factors, variability between contract sum and final account, a common situation in Ghana, can be controlled to achieve cost savings in public infrastructure projects.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)45-69
Number of pages25
JournalJournal of Facilities Management
Volume13
Issue number1
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2015

Fingerprint

Factor analysis
Government
Construction project
Costs
Risk factors
Factors
Risk assessment
Specifications
Defects
Principal components
Public infrastructure
Perceived risk
Cost savings
Design methodology
Scoring
Public project
Ranking
Infrastructure projects
Cost overrun
Funding

Keywords

  • Contract sum
  • final account
  • fuzzy synthetic evaluation
  • Cost overruns
  • Ghana
  • Construction projects

Cite this

A fuzzy model for evaluating risk impacts on variability between contract sum and final account in government-funded construction projects. / Ameyaw, Ernest Effah; Chan PC, Albert ; Owusu-Manu, De-Graft ; Coleman, Ekow.

In: Journal of Facilities Management, Vol. 13, No. 1, 2015, p. 45-69.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Ameyaw, Ernest Effah ; Chan PC, Albert ; Owusu-Manu, De-Graft ; Coleman, Ekow. / A fuzzy model for evaluating risk impacts on variability between contract sum and final account in government-funded construction projects. In: Journal of Facilities Management. 2015 ; Vol. 13, No. 1. pp. 45-69.
@article{271b9df5b6de4206b8e05a7f79072def,
title = "A fuzzy model for evaluating risk impacts on variability between contract sum and final account in government-funded construction projects",
abstract = "Purpose– The purpose of this paper is to identify and then evaluate perceived risk factors influencing variability between contract sum and final count, and to develop a fuzzy risk assessment model for evaluating the overall impact of established critical risk factors impacting on variability between contract sum and final account in government-funded construction projects. Construction projects are characterised by risk factors that significantly impact on variability between the contract sum and final account.Design/methodology/approach– A research approach integrating questionnaire survey, mean scoring ranking and principal component factor analysis (PCFA) methods was adopted to evaluate and classify the critical risk factors. A fuzzy synthetic evaluation method was sequentially applied to compute the overall risk impact (ORI) of eight critical risk factors’ impact on variability between contract sum and final account.Findings– Initial results showed that eight critical risk factors have high impact on variations between contract sum and final account, namely (in order): project funding problems, underestimation of quantities, variations by client, change in scope of works, inadequate specification, change in design by client, defects in design and unexpected site (ground) conditions. PCFA produced two factor solutions: “professional-related factors” and “client factors”. The fuzzy model further showed that the ORI is 5.48, indicating that these risk factors have a high impact on variability between contract sum and final account in public construction projects. The client factors have a very high impact (5.59), while the professional-related factors indicated a high impact (5.41) on project cost variability.Originality/value– A practical model is proposed to evaluate the key risks associated with cost overruns in public projects. By giving effective and sustained attention to these factors, variability between contract sum and final account, a common situation in Ghana, can be controlled to achieve cost savings in public infrastructure projects.",
keywords = "Contract sum, final account, fuzzy synthetic evaluation , Cost overruns, Ghana, Construction projects",
author = "Ameyaw, {Ernest Effah} and {Chan PC}, Albert and De-Graft Owusu-Manu and Ekow Coleman",
year = "2015",
doi = "10.1108/JFM-11-2013-0055",
language = "English",
volume = "13",
pages = "45--69",
journal = "Journal of Facilities Management",
issn = "1472-5967",
publisher = "Emerald",
number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - A fuzzy model for evaluating risk impacts on variability between contract sum and final account in government-funded construction projects

AU - Ameyaw, Ernest Effah

AU - Chan PC, Albert

AU - Owusu-Manu, De-Graft

AU - Coleman, Ekow

PY - 2015

Y1 - 2015

N2 - Purpose– The purpose of this paper is to identify and then evaluate perceived risk factors influencing variability between contract sum and final count, and to develop a fuzzy risk assessment model for evaluating the overall impact of established critical risk factors impacting on variability between contract sum and final account in government-funded construction projects. Construction projects are characterised by risk factors that significantly impact on variability between the contract sum and final account.Design/methodology/approach– A research approach integrating questionnaire survey, mean scoring ranking and principal component factor analysis (PCFA) methods was adopted to evaluate and classify the critical risk factors. A fuzzy synthetic evaluation method was sequentially applied to compute the overall risk impact (ORI) of eight critical risk factors’ impact on variability between contract sum and final account.Findings– Initial results showed that eight critical risk factors have high impact on variations between contract sum and final account, namely (in order): project funding problems, underestimation of quantities, variations by client, change in scope of works, inadequate specification, change in design by client, defects in design and unexpected site (ground) conditions. PCFA produced two factor solutions: “professional-related factors” and “client factors”. The fuzzy model further showed that the ORI is 5.48, indicating that these risk factors have a high impact on variability between contract sum and final account in public construction projects. The client factors have a very high impact (5.59), while the professional-related factors indicated a high impact (5.41) on project cost variability.Originality/value– A practical model is proposed to evaluate the key risks associated with cost overruns in public projects. By giving effective and sustained attention to these factors, variability between contract sum and final account, a common situation in Ghana, can be controlled to achieve cost savings in public infrastructure projects.

AB - Purpose– The purpose of this paper is to identify and then evaluate perceived risk factors influencing variability between contract sum and final count, and to develop a fuzzy risk assessment model for evaluating the overall impact of established critical risk factors impacting on variability between contract sum and final account in government-funded construction projects. Construction projects are characterised by risk factors that significantly impact on variability between the contract sum and final account.Design/methodology/approach– A research approach integrating questionnaire survey, mean scoring ranking and principal component factor analysis (PCFA) methods was adopted to evaluate and classify the critical risk factors. A fuzzy synthetic evaluation method was sequentially applied to compute the overall risk impact (ORI) of eight critical risk factors’ impact on variability between contract sum and final account.Findings– Initial results showed that eight critical risk factors have high impact on variations between contract sum and final account, namely (in order): project funding problems, underestimation of quantities, variations by client, change in scope of works, inadequate specification, change in design by client, defects in design and unexpected site (ground) conditions. PCFA produced two factor solutions: “professional-related factors” and “client factors”. The fuzzy model further showed that the ORI is 5.48, indicating that these risk factors have a high impact on variability between contract sum and final account in public construction projects. The client factors have a very high impact (5.59), while the professional-related factors indicated a high impact (5.41) on project cost variability.Originality/value– A practical model is proposed to evaluate the key risks associated with cost overruns in public projects. By giving effective and sustained attention to these factors, variability between contract sum and final account, a common situation in Ghana, can be controlled to achieve cost savings in public infrastructure projects.

KW - Contract sum

KW - final account

KW - fuzzy synthetic evaluation

KW - Cost overruns

KW - Ghana

KW - Construction projects

U2 - 10.1108/JFM-11-2013-0055

DO - 10.1108/JFM-11-2013-0055

M3 - Article

VL - 13

SP - 45

EP - 69

JO - Journal of Facilities Management

JF - Journal of Facilities Management

SN - 1472-5967

IS - 1

ER -