A critical review of postfeminist sensibility

Sarah Riley, Adrienne Evans, Sinikka Elliott, Carla Rice, Jeanne Marecek

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

7 Citations (Scopus)
67 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

This paper critically reviews how feminist academic psychologists, social scientists and media scholars have developed Rosalind Gill’s (2007a) generative construct ‘postfeminist sensibility’. We describe the key themes of postfeminist sensibility, a non-coherent set of ideas about femininity, embodiment and empowerment circulating across a range of media. Ideas that inform women’s sense of self, making postfeminist sensibility an important object for psychological study. We then consider research that drew on postfeminist sensibility, focusing on new sexual subjectivities, which developed analysis of agency, empowerment, and the possibilities and limitations in taking up new subjectivities associated with postfeminism, as well as who could take up these subjectivities. We show how such work identified complexities and contradictions in postfeminist sensibility and offer suggestions for how this work might be further developed, particularly by intersectionality-informed research. In the final section, we address contemporary debates surrounding postfeminism. We consider challenges and counter arguments to postfeminist sensibility as a useful term for describing contemporary patterns of sense making on gender, making the case for continuing research on postfeminist sensibility in the areas of digital cultures, a transformative imperative that includes the mind as well as the body, transnational postfeminism, and new forms of feminist activism. We conclude that such work would benefit from considering the ways that different technologies mediate the ideas and practices associated with postfeminist sensibility.
Original languageEnglish
Article numbere12367
JournalSocial and Personality Psychology Compass
Volume11
Issue number12
Early online date12 Dec 2017
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2017

Fingerprint

Research
Psychology
Femininity
Technology
Power (Psychology)

Bibliographical note

This is the peer reviewed version of the following article: Sarah Riley, Adrienne Evans, Sinikka Elliott, Carla Rice and Jeanne Marecek (2017) A critical review of postfeminist sensibility. Social and Personality Psychology Compass (11) 12, e12367, which has been published in final form at http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/wol1/doi/10.1111/spc3.12367/full. This article may be used for non-commercial purposes in accordance with Wiley Terms and Conditions for Self-Archiving.

Keywords

  • postfeminism
  • neoliberalism
  • gender
  • critical psychology
  • subjectivity
  • sexuality
  • poststructuralism

Cite this

A critical review of postfeminist sensibility. / Riley, Sarah; Evans, Adrienne; Elliott, Sinikka; Rice, Carla; Marecek, Jeanne.

In: Social and Personality Psychology Compass, Vol. 11, No. 12, e12367, 2017.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Riley, Sarah ; Evans, Adrienne ; Elliott, Sinikka ; Rice, Carla ; Marecek, Jeanne. / A critical review of postfeminist sensibility. In: Social and Personality Psychology Compass. 2017 ; Vol. 11, No. 12.
@article{134fa2fe537345e096f97b9aee56e239,
title = "A critical review of postfeminist sensibility",
abstract = "This paper critically reviews how feminist academic psychologists, social scientists and media scholars have developed Rosalind Gill’s (2007a) generative construct ‘postfeminist sensibility’. We describe the key themes of postfeminist sensibility, a non-coherent set of ideas about femininity, embodiment and empowerment circulating across a range of media. Ideas that inform women’s sense of self, making postfeminist sensibility an important object for psychological study. We then consider research that drew on postfeminist sensibility, focusing on new sexual subjectivities, which developed analysis of agency, empowerment, and the possibilities and limitations in taking up new subjectivities associated with postfeminism, as well as who could take up these subjectivities. We show how such work identified complexities and contradictions in postfeminist sensibility and offer suggestions for how this work might be further developed, particularly by intersectionality-informed research. In the final section, we address contemporary debates surrounding postfeminism. We consider challenges and counter arguments to postfeminist sensibility as a useful term for describing contemporary patterns of sense making on gender, making the case for continuing research on postfeminist sensibility in the areas of digital cultures, a transformative imperative that includes the mind as well as the body, transnational postfeminism, and new forms of feminist activism. We conclude that such work would benefit from considering the ways that different technologies mediate the ideas and practices associated with postfeminist sensibility.",
keywords = "postfeminism, neoliberalism, gender, critical psychology, subjectivity, sexuality, poststructuralism",
author = "Sarah Riley and Adrienne Evans and Sinikka Elliott and Carla Rice and Jeanne Marecek",
note = "This is the peer reviewed version of the following article: Sarah Riley, Adrienne Evans, Sinikka Elliott, Carla Rice and Jeanne Marecek (2017) A critical review of postfeminist sensibility. Social and Personality Psychology Compass (11) 12, e12367, which has been published in final form at http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/wol1/doi/10.1111/spc3.12367/full. This article may be used for non-commercial purposes in accordance with Wiley Terms and Conditions for Self-Archiving.",
year = "2017",
doi = "10.1111/spc3.12367",
language = "English",
volume = "11",
journal = "Social and Personality Psychology Compass",
issn = "1751-9004",
publisher = "Wiley",
number = "12",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - A critical review of postfeminist sensibility

AU - Riley, Sarah

AU - Evans, Adrienne

AU - Elliott, Sinikka

AU - Rice, Carla

AU - Marecek, Jeanne

N1 - This is the peer reviewed version of the following article: Sarah Riley, Adrienne Evans, Sinikka Elliott, Carla Rice and Jeanne Marecek (2017) A critical review of postfeminist sensibility. Social and Personality Psychology Compass (11) 12, e12367, which has been published in final form at http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/wol1/doi/10.1111/spc3.12367/full. This article may be used for non-commercial purposes in accordance with Wiley Terms and Conditions for Self-Archiving.

PY - 2017

Y1 - 2017

N2 - This paper critically reviews how feminist academic psychologists, social scientists and media scholars have developed Rosalind Gill’s (2007a) generative construct ‘postfeminist sensibility’. We describe the key themes of postfeminist sensibility, a non-coherent set of ideas about femininity, embodiment and empowerment circulating across a range of media. Ideas that inform women’s sense of self, making postfeminist sensibility an important object for psychological study. We then consider research that drew on postfeminist sensibility, focusing on new sexual subjectivities, which developed analysis of agency, empowerment, and the possibilities and limitations in taking up new subjectivities associated with postfeminism, as well as who could take up these subjectivities. We show how such work identified complexities and contradictions in postfeminist sensibility and offer suggestions for how this work might be further developed, particularly by intersectionality-informed research. In the final section, we address contemporary debates surrounding postfeminism. We consider challenges and counter arguments to postfeminist sensibility as a useful term for describing contemporary patterns of sense making on gender, making the case for continuing research on postfeminist sensibility in the areas of digital cultures, a transformative imperative that includes the mind as well as the body, transnational postfeminism, and new forms of feminist activism. We conclude that such work would benefit from considering the ways that different technologies mediate the ideas and practices associated with postfeminist sensibility.

AB - This paper critically reviews how feminist academic psychologists, social scientists and media scholars have developed Rosalind Gill’s (2007a) generative construct ‘postfeminist sensibility’. We describe the key themes of postfeminist sensibility, a non-coherent set of ideas about femininity, embodiment and empowerment circulating across a range of media. Ideas that inform women’s sense of self, making postfeminist sensibility an important object for psychological study. We then consider research that drew on postfeminist sensibility, focusing on new sexual subjectivities, which developed analysis of agency, empowerment, and the possibilities and limitations in taking up new subjectivities associated with postfeminism, as well as who could take up these subjectivities. We show how such work identified complexities and contradictions in postfeminist sensibility and offer suggestions for how this work might be further developed, particularly by intersectionality-informed research. In the final section, we address contemporary debates surrounding postfeminism. We consider challenges and counter arguments to postfeminist sensibility as a useful term for describing contemporary patterns of sense making on gender, making the case for continuing research on postfeminist sensibility in the areas of digital cultures, a transformative imperative that includes the mind as well as the body, transnational postfeminism, and new forms of feminist activism. We conclude that such work would benefit from considering the ways that different technologies mediate the ideas and practices associated with postfeminist sensibility.

KW - postfeminism

KW - neoliberalism

KW - gender

KW - critical psychology

KW - subjectivity

KW - sexuality

KW - poststructuralism

U2 - 10.1111/spc3.12367

DO - 10.1111/spc3.12367

M3 - Article

VL - 11

JO - Social and Personality Psychology Compass

JF - Social and Personality Psychology Compass

SN - 1751-9004

IS - 12

M1 - e12367

ER -