Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

A cost effectiveness analysis of midwife psycho-education for fearful pregnant women - a health system perspective for the antenatal period

  • J. Toohill
  • , E. Callander
  • , J. Gamble
  • , D. K. Creedy
  • , J. Fenwick

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

31 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

Background: Psycho-education can reduce childbirth fear and caesarean section numbers. This study determines the cost-effectiveness of a midwife-led psycho-education intervention for women fearful of birth. Method: One thousand four hundred ten pregnant women in south-east Queensland, Australia were screened for childbirth fear (W-DEQ A ≥ 66). Women with high scores (n = 339) were randomised to the BELIEF Study (Birth Emotions and Looking to Improve Expectant Fear) to receive psycho-education (n = 170) at 24 and 34 weeks of pregnancy or to the control group (n = 169). Women in both groups were surveyed 6 weeks postpartum with total cost for health service use during pregnancy calculated. Logistic regression models assessed the odds ratio of having vaginal birth or caesarean section in the study groups. Result: Of 339 women randomised, 184 (54%) women returned data at 6 weeks postpartum (Intervention Group n = 91; Control Group n = 93). Women receiving psycho-education had a higher likelihood of vaginal birth compared to controls (n = 60, 66% vs. n = 54, 58%; OR 2.34). Mean 'treatment' cost for women receiving psycho-education was AUS$72. Mean cost for health services excluding the cost of psycho-education, was less in the intervention group (AUS$1193 vs. AUS$1236), but not significant (p = 0.78). For every five women who received midwife counselling, one caesarean section was averted. The incremental healthcare cost to prevent one caesarean section using this intervention was AUS$145. Conclusion: Costs of delivering midwife psycho-education to women with childbirth fear during pregnancy are offset by improved vaginal birth rates and reduction in caesarean section numbers. Trial registration: Australian New Zealand Controlled Trials Registry ACTRN12612000526875 , 17th May 2012 (retrospectively registered one week after enrolment of first participant).

Original languageEnglish
Article number217
Number of pages7
JournalBMC Pregnancy and Childbirth
Volume17
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 11 Jul 2017
Externally publishedYes

Bibliographical note

Open Access This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0
International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and
reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to
the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver
(http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.

Funder

Funding Information:
The BELIEF study was funded by the National Health and Medical Research Council (NHMRC Grant ID APP1025099). The NHMRC played no role in the design of the study, or the collection, analysis, and interpretation of data or in writing the manuscript.

Funding

The BELIEF study was funded by the National Health and Medical Research Council (NHMRC Grant ID APP1025099). The NHMRC played no role in the design of the study, or the collection, analysis, and interpretation of data or in writing the manuscript.

Keywords

  • Caesarean section
  • Childbirth fear
  • Cost effectiveness
  • Midwife psycho-education
  • W-DEQ A

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Obstetrics and Gynaecology

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'A cost effectiveness analysis of midwife psycho-education for fearful pregnant women - a health system perspective for the antenatal period'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this