A conditional regime switching CAPM

Vasco Vendrame, Cherif Guermat, Jon Tucker

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

3 Citations (Scopus)
17 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

The standard Capital Asset Pricing Model (CAPM) is simple, intuitive, and grounded in sound economic theory. Yet, almost half a century's worth of empirical testing has so far failed to demonstrate its relevance. One major reason given for the CAPM's empirical failure is that beta is not the sole measure of systematic risk. In other words, the standard CAPM does not hold. Another important explanation is that the CAPM may hold conditionally rather than unconditionally. The standard CAPM fails to explain the cross-section of returns because it ignores the fact that both the risk and the price of risk are time-varying. The search for conditional models has led researchers to either disregard the theory behind the CAPM or to use statistical procedures that are too complex to be replicated by other researchers and practitioners. In this paper we propose a conditional model that is compatible with the standard CAPM while remaining simple and accessible to both researchers and practitioners. Beta and the risk premium are assumed to be time-varying, with the latter being associated with bull and bear states. We find strong support for the conditional CAPM with beta explaining both bull and bear markets. While the bear market ex-post risk premium is negative, the weighted average risk premium is positive and highly significant.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)1-11
Number of pages11
JournalInternational Review of Financial Analysis
Volume56
Early online date12 Dec 2017
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1 Mar 2018
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Regime switching
Capital asset pricing model
Risk premium
Bear market
Conditional model
Time-varying
Price of risk
Economic theory
Systematic risk
Testing
Cross section
Bull market

Bibliographical note

NOTICE: this is the author’s version of a work that was accepted for publication in International Review of Financial Analysis. Changes resulting from the publishing process, such as peer review, editing, corrections, structural formatting, and other quality control mechanisms may not be reflected in this document. Changes may have been made to this work since it was submitted for publication. A definitive version was subsequently published in International Review of Financial Analysis, Vol 56, 2018 DOI: 10.1016/j.irfa.2017.12.001

© 2017, Elsevier. Licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/

Keywords

  • Asset pricing
  • Bear market
  • Bull market
  • Conditional CAPM
  • Regime-switching

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Finance
  • Economics and Econometrics

Cite this

A conditional regime switching CAPM. / Vendrame, Vasco; Guermat, Cherif; Tucker, Jon.

In: International Review of Financial Analysis, Vol. 56, 01.03.2018, p. 1-11.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Vendrame, Vasco ; Guermat, Cherif ; Tucker, Jon. / A conditional regime switching CAPM. In: International Review of Financial Analysis. 2018 ; Vol. 56. pp. 1-11.
@article{b4f5363e067747fdb04749cdbf7ed107,
title = "A conditional regime switching CAPM",
abstract = "The standard Capital Asset Pricing Model (CAPM) is simple, intuitive, and grounded in sound economic theory. Yet, almost half a century's worth of empirical testing has so far failed to demonstrate its relevance. One major reason given for the CAPM's empirical failure is that beta is not the sole measure of systematic risk. In other words, the standard CAPM does not hold. Another important explanation is that the CAPM may hold conditionally rather than unconditionally. The standard CAPM fails to explain the cross-section of returns because it ignores the fact that both the risk and the price of risk are time-varying. The search for conditional models has led researchers to either disregard the theory behind the CAPM or to use statistical procedures that are too complex to be replicated by other researchers and practitioners. In this paper we propose a conditional model that is compatible with the standard CAPM while remaining simple and accessible to both researchers and practitioners. Beta and the risk premium are assumed to be time-varying, with the latter being associated with bull and bear states. We find strong support for the conditional CAPM with beta explaining both bull and bear markets. While the bear market ex-post risk premium is negative, the weighted average risk premium is positive and highly significant.",
keywords = "Asset pricing, Bear market, Bull market, Conditional CAPM, Regime-switching",
author = "Vasco Vendrame and Cherif Guermat and Jon Tucker",
note = "NOTICE: this is the author’s version of a work that was accepted for publication in International Review of Financial Analysis. Changes resulting from the publishing process, such as peer review, editing, corrections, structural formatting, and other quality control mechanisms may not be reflected in this document. Changes may have been made to this work since it was submitted for publication. A definitive version was subsequently published in International Review of Financial Analysis, Vol 56, 2018 DOI: 10.1016/j.irfa.2017.12.001 {\circledC} 2017, Elsevier. Licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/",
year = "2018",
month = "3",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1016/j.irfa.2017.12.001",
language = "English",
volume = "56",
pages = "1--11",
journal = "International Review of Financial Analysis",
issn = "1057-5219",
publisher = "Elsevier",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - A conditional regime switching CAPM

AU - Vendrame, Vasco

AU - Guermat, Cherif

AU - Tucker, Jon

N1 - NOTICE: this is the author’s version of a work that was accepted for publication in International Review of Financial Analysis. Changes resulting from the publishing process, such as peer review, editing, corrections, structural formatting, and other quality control mechanisms may not be reflected in this document. Changes may have been made to this work since it was submitted for publication. A definitive version was subsequently published in International Review of Financial Analysis, Vol 56, 2018 DOI: 10.1016/j.irfa.2017.12.001 © 2017, Elsevier. Licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/

PY - 2018/3/1

Y1 - 2018/3/1

N2 - The standard Capital Asset Pricing Model (CAPM) is simple, intuitive, and grounded in sound economic theory. Yet, almost half a century's worth of empirical testing has so far failed to demonstrate its relevance. One major reason given for the CAPM's empirical failure is that beta is not the sole measure of systematic risk. In other words, the standard CAPM does not hold. Another important explanation is that the CAPM may hold conditionally rather than unconditionally. The standard CAPM fails to explain the cross-section of returns because it ignores the fact that both the risk and the price of risk are time-varying. The search for conditional models has led researchers to either disregard the theory behind the CAPM or to use statistical procedures that are too complex to be replicated by other researchers and practitioners. In this paper we propose a conditional model that is compatible with the standard CAPM while remaining simple and accessible to both researchers and practitioners. Beta and the risk premium are assumed to be time-varying, with the latter being associated with bull and bear states. We find strong support for the conditional CAPM with beta explaining both bull and bear markets. While the bear market ex-post risk premium is negative, the weighted average risk premium is positive and highly significant.

AB - The standard Capital Asset Pricing Model (CAPM) is simple, intuitive, and grounded in sound economic theory. Yet, almost half a century's worth of empirical testing has so far failed to demonstrate its relevance. One major reason given for the CAPM's empirical failure is that beta is not the sole measure of systematic risk. In other words, the standard CAPM does not hold. Another important explanation is that the CAPM may hold conditionally rather than unconditionally. The standard CAPM fails to explain the cross-section of returns because it ignores the fact that both the risk and the price of risk are time-varying. The search for conditional models has led researchers to either disregard the theory behind the CAPM or to use statistical procedures that are too complex to be replicated by other researchers and practitioners. In this paper we propose a conditional model that is compatible with the standard CAPM while remaining simple and accessible to both researchers and practitioners. Beta and the risk premium are assumed to be time-varying, with the latter being associated with bull and bear states. We find strong support for the conditional CAPM with beta explaining both bull and bear markets. While the bear market ex-post risk premium is negative, the weighted average risk premium is positive and highly significant.

KW - Asset pricing

KW - Bear market

KW - Bull market

KW - Conditional CAPM

KW - Regime-switching

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85038253904&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.irfa.2017.12.001

DO - 10.1016/j.irfa.2017.12.001

M3 - Article

VL - 56

SP - 1

EP - 11

JO - International Review of Financial Analysis

JF - International Review of Financial Analysis

SN - 1057-5219

ER -