A Compositional Thermal Multiphase Wellbore Model for Use in Non-Isothermal Gas Lifting

Mahdi Sadri, Hojjat Mahdiyar, Ali Mohsenipour

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

In this paper, a new compositional mechanistic wellbore model, including gas lifting parameters, is presented. In the governing equations of this model, new terms for mass transfer between phases and the enthalpy of phase change which are important in non-isothermal gas lift systems have been considered. These terms have been ignored in some recent research studies and subsequent results show that by ignoring them, serious errors may arise. In the current research study, using a mechanistic drift-flux approach, the pressure distribution in a wellbore was modeled. To verify the new simulator, the results were compared with those of commercial simulators. They were also verified against the phase behavior analysis of the fluid flowing in the wellbore. In addition, in order to show the novel aspects of the new simulator, the results of the presented simulator were compared with the results of a recently proposed model found in the literature. It was concluded that neglecting phase change effects may cause significant errors in calculating pressure and temperature values along wellbores. This error could be significant, up to 24% depending on conditions, when flowing fluid pressure is close to its saturation point or in the case of simulating gas lift operation.
Original languageEnglish
Article number112902
Number of pages12
JournalJournal of Energy Resources Technology
Volume141
Issue number11
Early online date17 May 2019
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Nov 2019

Fingerprint

simulator
Simulators
Gases
Gas lifts
gas
Fluids
Phase behavior
fluid pressure
enthalpy
Pressure distribution
mass transfer
Enthalpy
Mass transfer
saturation
Fluxes
fluid
Hot Temperature
temperature
Temperature

Keywords

  • compositional simulator
  • wellbore simulator
  • multiphase flow
  • non-isothermal gas lifting
  • drift-flux model
  • modelling
  • oil and gas production
  • Petroleum Engineering
  • Oil well
  • Multi-phase
  • oil and gas Reservoir
  • Compositional simulator

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Energy(all)
  • Engineering(all)
  • Chemical Engineering(all)
  • Fluid Flow and Transfer Processes
  • Computers in Earth Sciences
  • Mechanical Engineering
  • Energy Engineering and Power Technology
  • Geochemistry and Petrology
  • Fuel Technology
  • Renewable Energy, Sustainability and the Environment

Cite this

A Compositional Thermal Multiphase Wellbore Model for Use in Non-Isothermal Gas Lifting. / Sadri, Mahdi; Mahdiyar, Hojjat; Mohsenipour, Ali.

In: Journal of Energy Resources Technology, Vol. 141, No. 11, 112902, 11.2019.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{f242cf2a91704e99b1715e1e87614eed,
title = "A Compositional Thermal Multiphase Wellbore Model for Use in Non-Isothermal Gas Lifting",
abstract = "In this paper, a new compositional mechanistic wellbore model, including gas lifting parameters, is presented. In the governing equations of this model, new terms for mass transfer between phases and the enthalpy of phase change which are important in non-isothermal gas lift systems have been considered. These terms have been ignored in some recent research studies and subsequent results show that by ignoring them, serious errors may arise. In the current research study, using a mechanistic drift-flux approach, the pressure distribution in a wellbore was modeled. To verify the new simulator, the results were compared with those of commercial simulators. They were also verified against the phase behavior analysis of the fluid flowing in the wellbore. In addition, in order to show the novel aspects of the new simulator, the results of the presented simulator were compared with the results of a recently proposed model found in the literature. It was concluded that neglecting phase change effects may cause significant errors in calculating pressure and temperature values along wellbores. This error could be significant, up to 24{\%} depending on conditions, when flowing fluid pressure is close to its saturation point or in the case of simulating gas lift operation.",
keywords = "compositional simulator, wellbore simulator, multiphase flow, non-isothermal gas lifting, drift-flux model, modelling, oil and gas production, Petroleum Engineering, Oil well, Multi-phase, oil and gas Reservoir, Compositional simulator",
author = "Mahdi Sadri and Hojjat Mahdiyar and Ali Mohsenipour",
year = "2019",
month = "11",
doi = "10.1115/1.4043653",
language = "English",
volume = "141",
journal = "Journal of Energy Resources Technology, Transactions of the ASME",
issn = "0195-0738",
publisher = "American Society of Mechanical Engineers (ASME)",
number = "11",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - A Compositional Thermal Multiphase Wellbore Model for Use in Non-Isothermal Gas Lifting

AU - Sadri, Mahdi

AU - Mahdiyar, Hojjat

AU - Mohsenipour, Ali

PY - 2019/11

Y1 - 2019/11

N2 - In this paper, a new compositional mechanistic wellbore model, including gas lifting parameters, is presented. In the governing equations of this model, new terms for mass transfer between phases and the enthalpy of phase change which are important in non-isothermal gas lift systems have been considered. These terms have been ignored in some recent research studies and subsequent results show that by ignoring them, serious errors may arise. In the current research study, using a mechanistic drift-flux approach, the pressure distribution in a wellbore was modeled. To verify the new simulator, the results were compared with those of commercial simulators. They were also verified against the phase behavior analysis of the fluid flowing in the wellbore. In addition, in order to show the novel aspects of the new simulator, the results of the presented simulator were compared with the results of a recently proposed model found in the literature. It was concluded that neglecting phase change effects may cause significant errors in calculating pressure and temperature values along wellbores. This error could be significant, up to 24% depending on conditions, when flowing fluid pressure is close to its saturation point or in the case of simulating gas lift operation.

AB - In this paper, a new compositional mechanistic wellbore model, including gas lifting parameters, is presented. In the governing equations of this model, new terms for mass transfer between phases and the enthalpy of phase change which are important in non-isothermal gas lift systems have been considered. These terms have been ignored in some recent research studies and subsequent results show that by ignoring them, serious errors may arise. In the current research study, using a mechanistic drift-flux approach, the pressure distribution in a wellbore was modeled. To verify the new simulator, the results were compared with those of commercial simulators. They were also verified against the phase behavior analysis of the fluid flowing in the wellbore. In addition, in order to show the novel aspects of the new simulator, the results of the presented simulator were compared with the results of a recently proposed model found in the literature. It was concluded that neglecting phase change effects may cause significant errors in calculating pressure and temperature values along wellbores. This error could be significant, up to 24% depending on conditions, when flowing fluid pressure is close to its saturation point or in the case of simulating gas lift operation.

KW - compositional simulator

KW - wellbore simulator

KW - multiphase flow

KW - non-isothermal gas lifting

KW - drift-flux model

KW - modelling

KW - oil and gas production

KW - Petroleum Engineering

KW - Oil well

KW - Multi-phase

KW - oil and gas Reservoir

KW - Compositional simulator

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85066076678&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1115/1.4043653

DO - 10.1115/1.4043653

M3 - Article

VL - 141

JO - Journal of Energy Resources Technology, Transactions of the ASME

JF - Journal of Energy Resources Technology, Transactions of the ASME

SN - 0195-0738

IS - 11

M1 - 112902

ER -