A Comparison of a Smartphone App with Other GPS Tracking Type Devices Employed in Football

Peter Tierney, Neil Clarke

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

10 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

OBJECTIVES The purpose of this study was to evaluate the use of a smartphone application in comparison against current GPS tracking type devices that are used to track players during football training and match play. Football involves repeated multi directional movements of the whole body at varying speeds and varying distances from walking to high speed running. Therefore, to evaluate validity and reliability of smartphones and elite tracker devices both were assessed and compared against each other for common metrics employed in football player activity tracking.METHODS  These being, walking ≤6km/hr, jogging 6.1-12km/hr, running 12.1-18km/hr, high speed running ≥18km/hr, total distance (m), max speed (km/hr) and positional heat map. Post analysis values obtained showed that there were no significant differences between smartphones employed in the study p<0.001 95%. Furthermore, values with both the smartphone app and the GPS tracking device showed a high degree of correlation (r = 0.94-0.99, p<0.001)RESULTS The results of this study show that a smartphone application can be used for capturing data in football environments. However, caution should be taken over what data to collect and use.CONCLUSIONS That said, having the ability to easily capture such data with a smartphone can provide a practical and inexpensive tool to measure and easily visualise physical activity in football participation.
Original languageEnglish
Number of pages7
JournalExercise Medicine
Volume3
Issue number4
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 24 Apr 2019

Fingerprint

Football
Equipment and Supplies
Running
Walking
Jogging
Reproducibility of Results
Smartphone
Hot Temperature

Bibliographical note

© The Author(s). 2019 Open Access; licensee Sapientia Publishing Group. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Keywords

  • GPS
  • Mobile application
  • Smartphone

Cite this

A Comparison of a Smartphone App with Other GPS Tracking Type Devices Employed in Football. / Tierney, Peter; Clarke, Neil.

In: Exercise Medicine, Vol. 3, No. 4, 24.04.2019.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{e11424a856c3490b9dc85b9264677004,
title = "A Comparison of a Smartphone App with Other GPS Tracking Type Devices Employed in Football",
abstract = "OBJECTIVES The purpose of this study was to evaluate the use of a smartphone application in comparison against current GPS tracking type devices that are used to track players during football training and match play. Football involves repeated multi directional movements of the whole body at varying speeds and varying distances from walking to high speed running. Therefore, to evaluate validity and reliability of smartphones and elite tracker devices both were assessed and compared against each other for common metrics employed in football player activity tracking.METHODS  These being, walking ≤6km/hr, jogging 6.1-12km/hr, running 12.1-18km/hr, high speed running ≥18km/hr, total distance (m), max speed (km/hr) and positional heat map. Post analysis values obtained showed that there were no significant differences between smartphones employed in the study p<0.001 95{\%}. Furthermore, values with both the smartphone app and the GPS tracking device showed a high degree of correlation (r = 0.94-0.99, p<0.001)RESULTS The results of this study show that a smartphone application can be used for capturing data in football environments. However, caution should be taken over what data to collect and use.CONCLUSIONS That said, having the ability to easily capture such data with a smartphone can provide a practical and inexpensive tool to measure and easily visualise physical activity in football participation.",
keywords = "GPS, Mobile application, Smartphone",
author = "Peter Tierney and Neil Clarke",
note = "{\circledC} The Author(s). 2019 Open Access; licensee Sapientia Publishing Group. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.",
year = "2019",
month = "4",
day = "24",
doi = "10.26644/em.2019.004",
language = "English",
volume = "3",
journal = "Exercise Medicine",
issn = "2508-9056",
publisher = "Sapientia Publishing Group",
number = "4",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - A Comparison of a Smartphone App with Other GPS Tracking Type Devices Employed in Football

AU - Tierney, Peter

AU - Clarke, Neil

N1 - © The Author(s). 2019 Open Access; licensee Sapientia Publishing Group. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

PY - 2019/4/24

Y1 - 2019/4/24

N2 - OBJECTIVES The purpose of this study was to evaluate the use of a smartphone application in comparison against current GPS tracking type devices that are used to track players during football training and match play. Football involves repeated multi directional movements of the whole body at varying speeds and varying distances from walking to high speed running. Therefore, to evaluate validity and reliability of smartphones and elite tracker devices both were assessed and compared against each other for common metrics employed in football player activity tracking.METHODS  These being, walking ≤6km/hr, jogging 6.1-12km/hr, running 12.1-18km/hr, high speed running ≥18km/hr, total distance (m), max speed (km/hr) and positional heat map. Post analysis values obtained showed that there were no significant differences between smartphones employed in the study p<0.001 95%. Furthermore, values with both the smartphone app and the GPS tracking device showed a high degree of correlation (r = 0.94-0.99, p<0.001)RESULTS The results of this study show that a smartphone application can be used for capturing data in football environments. However, caution should be taken over what data to collect and use.CONCLUSIONS That said, having the ability to easily capture such data with a smartphone can provide a practical and inexpensive tool to measure and easily visualise physical activity in football participation.

AB - OBJECTIVES The purpose of this study was to evaluate the use of a smartphone application in comparison against current GPS tracking type devices that are used to track players during football training and match play. Football involves repeated multi directional movements of the whole body at varying speeds and varying distances from walking to high speed running. Therefore, to evaluate validity and reliability of smartphones and elite tracker devices both were assessed and compared against each other for common metrics employed in football player activity tracking.METHODS  These being, walking ≤6km/hr, jogging 6.1-12km/hr, running 12.1-18km/hr, high speed running ≥18km/hr, total distance (m), max speed (km/hr) and positional heat map. Post analysis values obtained showed that there were no significant differences between smartphones employed in the study p<0.001 95%. Furthermore, values with both the smartphone app and the GPS tracking device showed a high degree of correlation (r = 0.94-0.99, p<0.001)RESULTS The results of this study show that a smartphone application can be used for capturing data in football environments. However, caution should be taken over what data to collect and use.CONCLUSIONS That said, having the ability to easily capture such data with a smartphone can provide a practical and inexpensive tool to measure and easily visualise physical activity in football participation.

KW - GPS

KW - Mobile application

KW - Smartphone

U2 - 10.26644/em.2019.004

DO - 10.26644/em.2019.004

M3 - Article

VL - 3

JO - Exercise Medicine

JF - Exercise Medicine

SN - 2508-9056

IS - 4

ER -