A comparative review of mobile health and electronic health utilization in sub-Saharan African countries

Brandford Bervell, Hosam Al-Samarraie

Research output: Contribution to journalReview article

Abstract

This study distinguished between the application of e-health and m-health technologies in sub-Saharan African (SSA) countries based on the dimensions of use, targeted diseases or health conditions, locations of use, and beneficiaries (types of patients or health workers) in a country specific context. It further characterized the main opportunities and challenges associated with these dimensions across the sub-region. A systematic review of the literature was conducted on 66 published peer reviewed articles. The review followed the scientific process of the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines of identification, selection, assessment, synthesis and interpretation of findings. The results of the study showed that m-health was prevalent in usage for promoting information for treatment and prevention of diseases as well as serving as an effective technology for reminders towards adherence. For e-health, the uniqueness lay in data acquisition and patients’ records management; diagnosis; training and recruitment. While m-health was never used for monitoring or training and recruitment, e-health on the other hand could not serve the purpose of reminders or for reporting cases from the field. Both technologies were however useful for adherence, diagnosis, disease control mechanisms, information provision, and decision-making/referrals. HIV/AIDS, malaria, and maternal (postnatal and antenatal) healthcare were important in both m-health and e-health interventions mostly concentrated in the rural settings of South Africa and Kenya. ICT infrastructure, trained personnel, illiteracy, lack of multilingual text and voice messages were major challenges hindering the effective usage of both m-health and e-health technologies.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)1-16
Number of pages16
JournalSocial Science and Medicine
Volume232
Early online date24 Apr 2019
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1 Jul 2019
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Telemedicine
utilization
electronics
Health
health
Biomedical Technology
Disease
Africa
Forms and Records Control
Text Messaging
Technology
Kenya
E-health
South Africa
illiteracy
data acquisition
Malaria
Meta-Analysis
Decision Making
Acquired Immunodeficiency Syndrome

Keywords

  • e-health
  • Healthcare delivery
  • m-Health
  • Sub-Saharan Africa
  • Utilization

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Health(social science)
  • History and Philosophy of Science

Cite this

A comparative review of mobile health and electronic health utilization in sub-Saharan African countries. / Bervell, Brandford; Al-Samarraie, Hosam.

In: Social Science and Medicine, Vol. 232, 01.07.2019, p. 1-16.

Research output: Contribution to journalReview article

@article{76f1ce0c8f2d4de099db7441af48df7b,
title = "A comparative review of mobile health and electronic health utilization in sub-Saharan African countries",
abstract = "This study distinguished between the application of e-health and m-health technologies in sub-Saharan African (SSA) countries based on the dimensions of use, targeted diseases or health conditions, locations of use, and beneficiaries (types of patients or health workers) in a country specific context. It further characterized the main opportunities and challenges associated with these dimensions across the sub-region. A systematic review of the literature was conducted on 66 published peer reviewed articles. The review followed the scientific process of the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines of identification, selection, assessment, synthesis and interpretation of findings. The results of the study showed that m-health was prevalent in usage for promoting information for treatment and prevention of diseases as well as serving as an effective technology for reminders towards adherence. For e-health, the uniqueness lay in data acquisition and patients’ records management; diagnosis; training and recruitment. While m-health was never used for monitoring or training and recruitment, e-health on the other hand could not serve the purpose of reminders or for reporting cases from the field. Both technologies were however useful for adherence, diagnosis, disease control mechanisms, information provision, and decision-making/referrals. HIV/AIDS, malaria, and maternal (postnatal and antenatal) healthcare were important in both m-health and e-health interventions mostly concentrated in the rural settings of South Africa and Kenya. ICT infrastructure, trained personnel, illiteracy, lack of multilingual text and voice messages were major challenges hindering the effective usage of both m-health and e-health technologies.",
keywords = "e-health, Healthcare delivery, m-Health, Sub-Saharan Africa, Utilization",
author = "Brandford Bervell and Hosam Al-Samarraie",
year = "2019",
month = "7",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1016/j.socscimed.2019.04.024",
language = "English",
volume = "232",
pages = "1--16",
journal = "Social Science & Medicine",
issn = "0277-9536",
publisher = "Elsevier",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - A comparative review of mobile health and electronic health utilization in sub-Saharan African countries

AU - Bervell, Brandford

AU - Al-Samarraie, Hosam

PY - 2019/7/1

Y1 - 2019/7/1

N2 - This study distinguished between the application of e-health and m-health technologies in sub-Saharan African (SSA) countries based on the dimensions of use, targeted diseases or health conditions, locations of use, and beneficiaries (types of patients or health workers) in a country specific context. It further characterized the main opportunities and challenges associated with these dimensions across the sub-region. A systematic review of the literature was conducted on 66 published peer reviewed articles. The review followed the scientific process of the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines of identification, selection, assessment, synthesis and interpretation of findings. The results of the study showed that m-health was prevalent in usage for promoting information for treatment and prevention of diseases as well as serving as an effective technology for reminders towards adherence. For e-health, the uniqueness lay in data acquisition and patients’ records management; diagnosis; training and recruitment. While m-health was never used for monitoring or training and recruitment, e-health on the other hand could not serve the purpose of reminders or for reporting cases from the field. Both technologies were however useful for adherence, diagnosis, disease control mechanisms, information provision, and decision-making/referrals. HIV/AIDS, malaria, and maternal (postnatal and antenatal) healthcare were important in both m-health and e-health interventions mostly concentrated in the rural settings of South Africa and Kenya. ICT infrastructure, trained personnel, illiteracy, lack of multilingual text and voice messages were major challenges hindering the effective usage of both m-health and e-health technologies.

AB - This study distinguished between the application of e-health and m-health technologies in sub-Saharan African (SSA) countries based on the dimensions of use, targeted diseases or health conditions, locations of use, and beneficiaries (types of patients or health workers) in a country specific context. It further characterized the main opportunities and challenges associated with these dimensions across the sub-region. A systematic review of the literature was conducted on 66 published peer reviewed articles. The review followed the scientific process of the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines of identification, selection, assessment, synthesis and interpretation of findings. The results of the study showed that m-health was prevalent in usage for promoting information for treatment and prevention of diseases as well as serving as an effective technology for reminders towards adherence. For e-health, the uniqueness lay in data acquisition and patients’ records management; diagnosis; training and recruitment. While m-health was never used for monitoring or training and recruitment, e-health on the other hand could not serve the purpose of reminders or for reporting cases from the field. Both technologies were however useful for adherence, diagnosis, disease control mechanisms, information provision, and decision-making/referrals. HIV/AIDS, malaria, and maternal (postnatal and antenatal) healthcare were important in both m-health and e-health interventions mostly concentrated in the rural settings of South Africa and Kenya. ICT infrastructure, trained personnel, illiteracy, lack of multilingual text and voice messages were major challenges hindering the effective usage of both m-health and e-health technologies.

KW - e-health

KW - Healthcare delivery

KW - m-Health

KW - Sub-Saharan Africa

KW - Utilization

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85064695928&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.socscimed.2019.04.024

DO - 10.1016/j.socscimed.2019.04.024

M3 - Review article

VL - 232

SP - 1

EP - 16

JO - Social Science & Medicine

JF - Social Science & Medicine

SN - 0277-9536

ER -