A comparative assessment of waste incinerators in the UK

J. D. Nixon, D. G. Wright, P. K. Dey, S. K. Ghosh, P. A. Davies

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

37 Citations (Scopus)
625 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

The uptake in Europe of Energy from Waste (EfW) incinerator plants has increased rapidly in recent years. In the UK, 25 municipal waste incinerators with energy recovery are now in operation; however, their waste supply chains and business practices vary significantly. With over a hundred more plant developments being considered it is important to establish best business practices for ensuring efficient environmental and operational performance. By reviewing the 25 plants we identify four suitable case study plants to compare technologies (moving grate, fluidised bed and rotary kiln), plant economics and operations. Using data collected from annual reports and through interviews and site visits we provide recommendations for improving the supply chain for waste incinerators and highlight the current issues and challenges faced by the industry. We find that plants using moving grate have a high availability of 87-92%. However, compared to the fluidised bed and rotary kiln, quantities of bottom ash and emissions of hydrogen chloride and carbon monoxide are high. The uptake of integrated recycling practices, combined heat and power, and post incineration non-ferrous metal collections needs to be increased among EfW incinerators in the UK. We conclude that one of the major difficulties encountered by waste facilities is the appropriate selection of technology, capacity, site, waste suppliers and heat consumers. This study will be of particular value to EfW plant developers, government authorities and researchers working within the sector of waste management.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)2234-2244
Number of pages11
JournalWaste Management
Volume33
Issue number11
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Nov 2013
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

waste facility
energy
combined heat and power
bottom ash
waste incinerator
incineration
carbon monoxide
waste management
recycling
chloride
hydrogen
industry
economics
fluidised bed
selection of technology
municipal waste
energy recovery
Europe
non-ferrous metal
recommendation

Bibliographical note

Publisher Statement: NOTICE: this is theauthor’s version of a work that was accepted for publication in WasteManagement. Changes resulting from the publishing process, such as peer review,editing, corrections, structural formatting, and other quality controlmechanisms may not be reflected in this document. Changes may have been made tothis work since it was submitted for publication. A definitive version wassubsequently published in Waste Management, [33, 11, (2017)] DOI: 10.1016/j.wasman.2013.08.001



http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/

Keywords

  • Energy from Waste (EfW)
  • Green supply chains
  • Incineration
  • Municipal solid waste (MSW)
  • Waste-to-energy

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Waste Management and Disposal

Cite this

Nixon, J. D., Wright, D. G., Dey, P. K., Ghosh, S. K., & Davies, P. A. (2013). A comparative assessment of waste incinerators in the UK. Waste Management, 33(11), 2234-2244. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wasman.2013.08.001

A comparative assessment of waste incinerators in the UK. / Nixon, J. D.; Wright, D. G.; Dey, P. K.; Ghosh, S. K.; Davies, P. A.

In: Waste Management, Vol. 33, No. 11, 11.2013, p. 2234-2244.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Nixon, JD, Wright, DG, Dey, PK, Ghosh, SK & Davies, PA 2013, 'A comparative assessment of waste incinerators in the UK' Waste Management, vol. 33, no. 11, pp. 2234-2244. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wasman.2013.08.001
Nixon, J. D. ; Wright, D. G. ; Dey, P. K. ; Ghosh, S. K. ; Davies, P. A. / A comparative assessment of waste incinerators in the UK. In: Waste Management. 2013 ; Vol. 33, No. 11. pp. 2234-2244.
@article{cd90857c0ebb45f980c61665a8c27958,
title = "A comparative assessment of waste incinerators in the UK",
abstract = "The uptake in Europe of Energy from Waste (EfW) incinerator plants has increased rapidly in recent years. In the UK, 25 municipal waste incinerators with energy recovery are now in operation; however, their waste supply chains and business practices vary significantly. With over a hundred more plant developments being considered it is important to establish best business practices for ensuring efficient environmental and operational performance. By reviewing the 25 plants we identify four suitable case study plants to compare technologies (moving grate, fluidised bed and rotary kiln), plant economics and operations. Using data collected from annual reports and through interviews and site visits we provide recommendations for improving the supply chain for waste incinerators and highlight the current issues and challenges faced by the industry. We find that plants using moving grate have a high availability of 87-92{\%}. However, compared to the fluidised bed and rotary kiln, quantities of bottom ash and emissions of hydrogen chloride and carbon monoxide are high. The uptake of integrated recycling practices, combined heat and power, and post incineration non-ferrous metal collections needs to be increased among EfW incinerators in the UK. We conclude that one of the major difficulties encountered by waste facilities is the appropriate selection of technology, capacity, site, waste suppliers and heat consumers. This study will be of particular value to EfW plant developers, government authorities and researchers working within the sector of waste management.",
keywords = "Energy from Waste (EfW), Green supply chains, Incineration, Municipal solid waste (MSW), Waste-to-energy",
author = "Nixon, {J. D.} and Wright, {D. G.} and Dey, {P. K.} and Ghosh, {S. K.} and Davies, {P. A.}",
note = "Publisher Statement: NOTICE: this is theauthor’s version of a work that was accepted for publication in WasteManagement. Changes resulting from the publishing process, such as peer review,editing, corrections, structural formatting, and other quality controlmechanisms may not be reflected in this document. Changes may have been made tothis work since it was submitted for publication. A definitive version wassubsequently published in Waste Management, [33, 11, (2017)] DOI: 10.1016/j.wasman.2013.08.001 http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/",
year = "2013",
month = "11",
doi = "10.1016/j.wasman.2013.08.001",
language = "English",
volume = "33",
pages = "2234--2244",
journal = "Waste Management",
issn = "0956-053X",
publisher = "Pergamon Press Ltd.",
number = "11",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - A comparative assessment of waste incinerators in the UK

AU - Nixon, J. D.

AU - Wright, D. G.

AU - Dey, P. K.

AU - Ghosh, S. K.

AU - Davies, P. A.

N1 - Publisher Statement: NOTICE: this is theauthor’s version of a work that was accepted for publication in WasteManagement. Changes resulting from the publishing process, such as peer review,editing, corrections, structural formatting, and other quality controlmechanisms may not be reflected in this document. Changes may have been made tothis work since it was submitted for publication. A definitive version wassubsequently published in Waste Management, [33, 11, (2017)] DOI: 10.1016/j.wasman.2013.08.001 http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/

PY - 2013/11

Y1 - 2013/11

N2 - The uptake in Europe of Energy from Waste (EfW) incinerator plants has increased rapidly in recent years. In the UK, 25 municipal waste incinerators with energy recovery are now in operation; however, their waste supply chains and business practices vary significantly. With over a hundred more plant developments being considered it is important to establish best business practices for ensuring efficient environmental and operational performance. By reviewing the 25 plants we identify four suitable case study plants to compare technologies (moving grate, fluidised bed and rotary kiln), plant economics and operations. Using data collected from annual reports and through interviews and site visits we provide recommendations for improving the supply chain for waste incinerators and highlight the current issues and challenges faced by the industry. We find that plants using moving grate have a high availability of 87-92%. However, compared to the fluidised bed and rotary kiln, quantities of bottom ash and emissions of hydrogen chloride and carbon monoxide are high. The uptake of integrated recycling practices, combined heat and power, and post incineration non-ferrous metal collections needs to be increased among EfW incinerators in the UK. We conclude that one of the major difficulties encountered by waste facilities is the appropriate selection of technology, capacity, site, waste suppliers and heat consumers. This study will be of particular value to EfW plant developers, government authorities and researchers working within the sector of waste management.

AB - The uptake in Europe of Energy from Waste (EfW) incinerator plants has increased rapidly in recent years. In the UK, 25 municipal waste incinerators with energy recovery are now in operation; however, their waste supply chains and business practices vary significantly. With over a hundred more plant developments being considered it is important to establish best business practices for ensuring efficient environmental and operational performance. By reviewing the 25 plants we identify four suitable case study plants to compare technologies (moving grate, fluidised bed and rotary kiln), plant economics and operations. Using data collected from annual reports and through interviews and site visits we provide recommendations for improving the supply chain for waste incinerators and highlight the current issues and challenges faced by the industry. We find that plants using moving grate have a high availability of 87-92%. However, compared to the fluidised bed and rotary kiln, quantities of bottom ash and emissions of hydrogen chloride and carbon monoxide are high. The uptake of integrated recycling practices, combined heat and power, and post incineration non-ferrous metal collections needs to be increased among EfW incinerators in the UK. We conclude that one of the major difficulties encountered by waste facilities is the appropriate selection of technology, capacity, site, waste suppliers and heat consumers. This study will be of particular value to EfW plant developers, government authorities and researchers working within the sector of waste management.

KW - Energy from Waste (EfW)

KW - Green supply chains

KW - Incineration

KW - Municipal solid waste (MSW)

KW - Waste-to-energy

U2 - 10.1016/j.wasman.2013.08.001

DO - 10.1016/j.wasman.2013.08.001

M3 - Article

VL - 33

SP - 2234

EP - 2244

JO - Waste Management

JF - Waste Management

SN - 0956-053X

IS - 11

ER -