A classification of genre families in university student writing

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

    69 Citations (Scopus)
    372 Downloads (Pure)

    Abstract

    As demand for English-medium higher education continues to grow internationally and participation in higher education increases, the need for a better understanding of academic writing is pressing. Prior university wide taxonomies of student writing have relied on intuition, the opinions of faculty, or data from course documentation and task prompts. In contrast, our classification is grounded in analysis of all 2858 BAWE (British Academic Written English) corpus texts actually produced by undergraduate and taught postgraduate university students in England for assessment purposes. This builds on the American tradition of classifying university student writing tasks (e.g. Horowitz 1986; Hale et al. 1996; Melzer 2009) and the very different Australian tradition of classifying primary and secondary school children’s written texts as genres (e.g. Martin and Rothery 1986; Coffin 2006). Understanding our classification of 13 genre families enables more meaningful interrogation of the BAWE corpus by teachers and researchers. The diversity in student genres across disciplines and levels of study is noteworthy for academic writing materials developers and all interested in the nature of higher education.
    Original languageEnglish
    Pages (from-to)25-52
    JournalApplied Linguistics
    Volume34
    Issue number1
    DOIs
    Publication statusPublished - 2013

    Fingerprint

    genre
    Students
    university
    Education
    student
    education
    Taxonomies
    intuition
    taxonomy
    documentation
    primary school
    secondary school
    participation
    Student Writing
    demand
    teacher
    Academic Writing
    Prompts
    Teaching
    English Medium

    Bibliographical note

    This is a pre-copy-editing, author-produced PDF of an article accepted for publication in Applied Linguistics following peer review. The definitive publisher-authenticated version Gardner, S. and Nesi, H. (2013) A classification of genre families in university student writing. Applied Linguistics, volume 34 (1): 25-52 is available online at: http://applij.oxfordjournals.org/content/34/1/25.

    Keywords

    • corpora
    • English for academic purposes
    • genre
    • higher education
    • Systemic Functional Linguistics
    • writing

    Cite this

    A classification of genre families in university student writing. / Gardner, Sheena; Nesi, Hilary.

    In: Applied Linguistics, Vol. 34, No. 1, 2013, p. 25-52.

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

    @article{720c33a641824f33ab05409dd8ec1bfc,
    title = "A classification of genre families in university student writing",
    abstract = "As demand for English-medium higher education continues to grow internationally and participation in higher education increases, the need for a better understanding of academic writing is pressing. Prior university wide taxonomies of student writing have relied on intuition, the opinions of faculty, or data from course documentation and task prompts. In contrast, our classification is grounded in analysis of all 2858 BAWE (British Academic Written English) corpus texts actually produced by undergraduate and taught postgraduate university students in England for assessment purposes. This builds on the American tradition of classifying university student writing tasks (e.g. Horowitz 1986; Hale et al. 1996; Melzer 2009) and the very different Australian tradition of classifying primary and secondary school children’s written texts as genres (e.g. Martin and Rothery 1986; Coffin 2006). Understanding our classification of 13 genre families enables more meaningful interrogation of the BAWE corpus by teachers and researchers. The diversity in student genres across disciplines and levels of study is noteworthy for academic writing materials developers and all interested in the nature of higher education.",
    keywords = "corpora, English for academic purposes, genre, higher education, Systemic Functional Linguistics, writing",
    author = "Sheena Gardner and Hilary Nesi",
    note = "This is a pre-copy-editing, author-produced PDF of an article accepted for publication in Applied Linguistics following peer review. The definitive publisher-authenticated version Gardner, S. and Nesi, H. (2013) A classification of genre families in university student writing. Applied Linguistics, volume 34 (1): 25-52 is available online at: http://applij.oxfordjournals.org/content/34/1/25.",
    year = "2013",
    doi = "10.1093/applin/ams024",
    language = "English",
    volume = "34",
    pages = "25--52",
    journal = "Applied Linguistics",
    issn = "0142-6001",
    publisher = "Oxford University Press",
    number = "1",

    }

    TY - JOUR

    T1 - A classification of genre families in university student writing

    AU - Gardner, Sheena

    AU - Nesi, Hilary

    N1 - This is a pre-copy-editing, author-produced PDF of an article accepted for publication in Applied Linguistics following peer review. The definitive publisher-authenticated version Gardner, S. and Nesi, H. (2013) A classification of genre families in university student writing. Applied Linguistics, volume 34 (1): 25-52 is available online at: http://applij.oxfordjournals.org/content/34/1/25.

    PY - 2013

    Y1 - 2013

    N2 - As demand for English-medium higher education continues to grow internationally and participation in higher education increases, the need for a better understanding of academic writing is pressing. Prior university wide taxonomies of student writing have relied on intuition, the opinions of faculty, or data from course documentation and task prompts. In contrast, our classification is grounded in analysis of all 2858 BAWE (British Academic Written English) corpus texts actually produced by undergraduate and taught postgraduate university students in England for assessment purposes. This builds on the American tradition of classifying university student writing tasks (e.g. Horowitz 1986; Hale et al. 1996; Melzer 2009) and the very different Australian tradition of classifying primary and secondary school children’s written texts as genres (e.g. Martin and Rothery 1986; Coffin 2006). Understanding our classification of 13 genre families enables more meaningful interrogation of the BAWE corpus by teachers and researchers. The diversity in student genres across disciplines and levels of study is noteworthy for academic writing materials developers and all interested in the nature of higher education.

    AB - As demand for English-medium higher education continues to grow internationally and participation in higher education increases, the need for a better understanding of academic writing is pressing. Prior university wide taxonomies of student writing have relied on intuition, the opinions of faculty, or data from course documentation and task prompts. In contrast, our classification is grounded in analysis of all 2858 BAWE (British Academic Written English) corpus texts actually produced by undergraduate and taught postgraduate university students in England for assessment purposes. This builds on the American tradition of classifying university student writing tasks (e.g. Horowitz 1986; Hale et al. 1996; Melzer 2009) and the very different Australian tradition of classifying primary and secondary school children’s written texts as genres (e.g. Martin and Rothery 1986; Coffin 2006). Understanding our classification of 13 genre families enables more meaningful interrogation of the BAWE corpus by teachers and researchers. The diversity in student genres across disciplines and levels of study is noteworthy for academic writing materials developers and all interested in the nature of higher education.

    KW - corpora

    KW - English for academic purposes

    KW - genre

    KW - higher education

    KW - Systemic Functional Linguistics

    KW - writing

    U2 - 10.1093/applin/ams024

    DO - 10.1093/applin/ams024

    M3 - Article

    VL - 34

    SP - 25

    EP - 52

    JO - Applied Linguistics

    JF - Applied Linguistics

    SN - 0142-6001

    IS - 1

    ER -