A case for using online discussion forums in critical psychological research

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

26 Citations (Scopus)
360 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

Online forums provide a wealth of publicly accessible data and have proven particularly useful for critical psychologists wishing to examine naturalistic data on a wide range of social phenomena. This paper begins by considering the use of online discussion forums for critical discursive psychological research and outlines ethical debates regarding their use (particularly in light of past and current British Psychological Society guidelines). To demonstrate how such data can be used in critical psychology I provide an illustrative example of a discursive analysis of a single online discussion thread taken from a diabetes newsgroup that examines anti-social online behaviours in the form of ‘trolling’, ‘flaming’ and heterosexism. Publisher statement: This is an Accepted Manuscript of an article published by Taylor & Francis in Qualitative Research in Psychology on 3rd February 2015, available online: www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/14780887.2015.1008906.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)287-297
JournalQualitative Research in Psychology
Volume12
Issue number3
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2015

Fingerprint

Psychology
Research
Manuscripts
Qualitative Research
Guidelines

Bibliographical note

This is an Accepted Manuscript of an article published by Taylor & Francis in Qualitative Research in Psychology on 3rd February 2015, available online: www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/14780887.2015.1008906.

Keywords

  • Online discussion forums
  • Internet research
  • Internet ethics
  • Discourse analysis
  • Heterosexism
  • Trolling
  • Flaming

Cite this

A case for using online discussion forums in critical psychological research. / Jowett, Adam.

In: Qualitative Research in Psychology, Vol. 12, No. 3, 2015, p. 287-297.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{5584cd5446404c738b202a3bede15d41,
title = "A case for using online discussion forums in critical psychological research",
abstract = "Online forums provide a wealth of publicly accessible data and have proven particularly useful for critical psychologists wishing to examine naturalistic data on a wide range of social phenomena. This paper begins by considering the use of online discussion forums for critical discursive psychological research and outlines ethical debates regarding their use (particularly in light of past and current British Psychological Society guidelines). To demonstrate how such data can be used in critical psychology I provide an illustrative example of a discursive analysis of a single online discussion thread taken from a diabetes newsgroup that examines anti-social online behaviours in the form of ‘trolling’, ‘flaming’ and heterosexism. Publisher statement: This is an Accepted Manuscript of an article published by Taylor & Francis in Qualitative Research in Psychology on 3rd February 2015, available online: www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/14780887.2015.1008906.",
keywords = "Online discussion forums, Internet research, Internet ethics, Discourse analysis, Heterosexism, Trolling, Flaming",
author = "Adam Jowett",
note = "This is an Accepted Manuscript of an article published by Taylor & Francis in Qualitative Research in Psychology on 3rd February 2015, available online: www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/14780887.2015.1008906.",
year = "2015",
doi = "10.1080/14780887.2015.1008906",
language = "English",
volume = "12",
pages = "287--297",
journal = "Qualitative Research in Psychology",
issn = "1478-0887",
publisher = "Taylor & Francis",
number = "3",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - A case for using online discussion forums in critical psychological research

AU - Jowett, Adam

N1 - This is an Accepted Manuscript of an article published by Taylor & Francis in Qualitative Research in Psychology on 3rd February 2015, available online: www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/14780887.2015.1008906.

PY - 2015

Y1 - 2015

N2 - Online forums provide a wealth of publicly accessible data and have proven particularly useful for critical psychologists wishing to examine naturalistic data on a wide range of social phenomena. This paper begins by considering the use of online discussion forums for critical discursive psychological research and outlines ethical debates regarding their use (particularly in light of past and current British Psychological Society guidelines). To demonstrate how such data can be used in critical psychology I provide an illustrative example of a discursive analysis of a single online discussion thread taken from a diabetes newsgroup that examines anti-social online behaviours in the form of ‘trolling’, ‘flaming’ and heterosexism. Publisher statement: This is an Accepted Manuscript of an article published by Taylor & Francis in Qualitative Research in Psychology on 3rd February 2015, available online: www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/14780887.2015.1008906.

AB - Online forums provide a wealth of publicly accessible data and have proven particularly useful for critical psychologists wishing to examine naturalistic data on a wide range of social phenomena. This paper begins by considering the use of online discussion forums for critical discursive psychological research and outlines ethical debates regarding their use (particularly in light of past and current British Psychological Society guidelines). To demonstrate how such data can be used in critical psychology I provide an illustrative example of a discursive analysis of a single online discussion thread taken from a diabetes newsgroup that examines anti-social online behaviours in the form of ‘trolling’, ‘flaming’ and heterosexism. Publisher statement: This is an Accepted Manuscript of an article published by Taylor & Francis in Qualitative Research in Psychology on 3rd February 2015, available online: www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/14780887.2015.1008906.

KW - Online discussion forums

KW - Internet research

KW - Internet ethics

KW - Discourse analysis

KW - Heterosexism

KW - Trolling

KW - Flaming

U2 - 10.1080/14780887.2015.1008906

DO - 10.1080/14780887.2015.1008906

M3 - Article

VL - 12

SP - 287

EP - 297

JO - Qualitative Research in Psychology

JF - Qualitative Research in Psychology

SN - 1478-0887

IS - 3

ER -