Abstract
Mainstream agricultural research takes a rational approach to generate, empirical, tangible knowledge for increased yields and sustainability. This approach has led to the development of technological tools to support farmers in their management decision-making, which, while helpful, are not able to factor in the complex, dynamic variables that motivate farmer decision-making. More importantly, farmers often do not adopt these tools as expected.
Could a solution lie in considering other sources and types of agricultural knowledge? Some farmers report relying largely on intuition (knowing from within) to inform their practical management decisions, resulting in both qualitative and quantitative benefits. Intuition allows access to valuable tacit (informal, intangible) knowledge, which can be used to explore and apply more resilient agricultural practices. It is an immediate and valuable part of decision-making, and deserves more attention from both farmers and researchers. This paper discusses potential advantages, challenges to, and methods of mainstreaming farmer intuition, and presents appropriate methodologies for its development, emphasizing the need to expand the underlying ontology and epistemology of the mainstream scientific community.
Could a solution lie in considering other sources and types of agricultural knowledge? Some farmers report relying largely on intuition (knowing from within) to inform their practical management decisions, resulting in both qualitative and quantitative benefits. Intuition allows access to valuable tacit (informal, intangible) knowledge, which can be used to explore and apply more resilient agricultural practices. It is an immediate and valuable part of decision-making, and deserves more attention from both farmers and researchers. This paper discusses potential advantages, challenges to, and methods of mainstreaming farmer intuition, and presents appropriate methodologies for its development, emphasizing the need to expand the underlying ontology and epistemology of the mainstream scientific community.
Original language | English |
---|---|
Article number | 956665 |
Pages (from-to) | 278-285 |
Number of pages | 8 |
Journal | Outlook on Agriculture |
Volume | 49 |
Issue number | 4 |
Early online date | 10 Sept 2020 |
DOIs | |
Publication status | Published - 1 Dec 2020 |
Bibliographical note
Copyright © and Moral Rights are retained by the author(s) and/ or other copyright owners. A copy can be downloaded for personal non-commercial research or study, without prior permission or charge. This item cannot be reproduced or quoted extensively from without first obtaining permission in writing from the copyright holder(s). The content must not be changed in any way or sold commercially in any format or mediumwithout the formal permission of the copyright holders.
This document is the author’s post-print version, incorporating any revisions agreed during the peer-review process. Some differences between the published version and this version
may remain and you are advised to consult the published version if you wish to cite from it.
Funder
Department of Science and Technology [grant number 81789/2012], the National Research Foundation [grant number 95435] of South AfricaKeywords
- Farmer decision-making
- farm management
- tacit knowledge
- holistic decisions
- resilient farming systems
ASJC Scopus subject areas
- Animal Science and Zoology
- Agronomy and Crop Science
- Ecology
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'A call to focus on farmer intuition for improved management decision making'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Profiles
-
Julia Wright
- Centre for Agroecology, Water and Resilience - Associate Professor
Person: Teaching and Research