Ítems de referencia para publicar Protocolos de Revisiones Sistemáticas y Metaanálisis: Declaración PRISMA-P 2015

PRISMA-P Group; D. Moher; L. Shamseer; M. Clarke; D. Ghersi; A. Liberati; M. Petticrew; P. Shekelle; L.A. Stewart; A. Booth; M. Page

doi:10.1186/2046-4053-4-1

Ítems de referencia para publicar Protocolos de Revisiones Sistemáticas y Metaanálisis: Declaración PRISMA-P 2015

Translated title of the contribution: Preferred reporting items for systematic review and meta-analysis protocols (PRISMA-P) 2015 statement

PRISMA-P Group
, D. Moher
, L. Shamseer
, M. Clarke
, D. Ghersi
, A. Liberati
, M. Petticrew
, P. Shekelle
, L.A. Stewart
, A. Booth
, M. Page

Ottawa Hospital Research Institute
Queen's University Belfast
National Health and Medical Research Council
London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine
Southern California Evidence-based Practice Center
University of Oxford
University of York
University of Toronto
Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality
Canadian Agency for Drugs and Technologies in Health
Johns Hopkins University
University of Bern
Cochrane Denmark
Cochrane Canada
BMJ
University of Bristol
Cochrane
Brown University
University of Modena and Reggio Emilia
University of North Carolina
University of Ottawa
Annals of Internal Medicine
PLoS Medicine
Monash University
Children’s Hospital of Eastern Ontario
McMaster University
The Lancet
The Cochrane Library
Kaiser Permanente Evidence-based Practice Center

Research output: Contribution to journal › Article › peer-review

708 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Systematic reviews should build on a protocol that describes the rationale, hypothesis, and planned methods of the review; few reviews report whether a protocol exists. Detailed, well-described protocols can facilitate the understanding and appraisal of the review methods, as well as the detection of modifications to methods and selective reporting in completed reviews. We describe the development of a reporting guideline, the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-Analyses for Protocols 2015 (PRISMA-P 2015). PRISMA-P consists of a 17-item checklist intended to facilitate the preparation and reporting of a robust protocol for the systematic review. Funders and those commissioning reviews might consider mandating the use of the checklist to facilitate the submission of relevant protocol information in funding applications. Similarly, peer reviewers and editors can use the guidance to gauge the completeness and transparency of a systematic review protocol submitted for publication in a journal or other medium.

Translated title of the contribution	Preferred reporting items for systematic review and meta-analysis protocols (PRISMA-P) 2015 statement
Original language	Spanish
Pages (from-to)	148-160
Number of pages	13
Journal	Revista Espanola de Nutricion Humana y Dietetica
Volume	20
Issue number	2
DOIs	https://doi.org/10.1186/2046-4053-4-1
Publication status	Published - 18 Feb 2016
Externally published	Yes

Bibliographical note

Cited By :137

Export Date: 26 July 2021

Access to Document

10.1186/2046-4053-4-1Licence: CC BY-NC-SA

https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-85050102326&doi=10.1186%2f2046-4053-4-1&partnerID=40&md5=a079d0dd0736ce631515fa5ea5657643

Cite this

PRISMA-P Group, Moher, D., Shamseer, L., Clarke, M., Ghersi, D., Liberati, A., Petticrew, M., Shekelle, P., Stewart, L. A., Booth, A., & Page, M. (2016). Ítems de referencia para publicar Protocolos de Revisiones Sistemáticas y Metaanálisis: Declaración PRISMA-P 2015. Revista Espanola de Nutricion Humana y Dietetica, 20(2), 148-160. https://doi.org/10.1186/2046-4053-4-1

PRISMA-P Group, Moher, D, Shamseer, L, Clarke, M, Ghersi, D, Liberati, A, Petticrew, M, Shekelle, P, Stewart, LA, Booth, A & Page, M 2016, 'Ítems de referencia para publicar Protocolos de Revisiones Sistemáticas y Metaanálisis: Declaración PRISMA-P 2015', Revista Espanola de Nutricion Humana y Dietetica, vol. 20, no. 2, pp. 148-160. https://doi.org/10.1186/2046-4053-4-1

@article{759b059ef4744c2783c7b56bbf67a0d6,

title = "{\'I}tems de referencia para publicar Protocolos de Revisiones Sistem{\'a}ticas y Metaan{\'a}lisis: Declaraci{\'o}n PRISMA-P 2015",

abstract = "Systematic reviews should build on a protocol that describes the rationale, hypothesis, and planned methods of the review; few reviews report whether a protocol exists. Detailed, well-described protocols can facilitate the understanding and appraisal of the review methods, as well as the detection of modifications to methods and selective reporting in completed reviews. We describe the development of a reporting guideline, the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-Analyses for Protocols 2015 (PRISMA-P 2015). PRISMA-P consists of a 17-item checklist intended to facilitate the preparation and reporting of a robust protocol for the systematic review. Funders and those commissioning reviews might consider mandating the use of the checklist to facilitate the submission of relevant protocol information in funding applications. Similarly, peer reviewers and editors can use the guidance to gauge the completeness and transparency of a systematic review protocol submitted for publication in a journal or other medium.",

author = "\{PRISMA-P Group\} and D. Moher and L. Shamseer and M. Clarke and D. Ghersi and A. Liberati and M. Petticrew and P. Shekelle and L.A. Stewart and M. Estarli and E.S.A. Barrera and R. Mart{\'i}nez-Rodr{\'i}guez and E. Baladia and S.D. Ag{\"u}ero and S. Camacho and K. Buhring and A. Herrero-L{\'o}pez and D.M. Gil-Gonz{\'a}lez and D.G. Altman and A. Booth and A.-W. Chan and S. Chang and T. Clifford and K. Dickersin and M. Egger and P.C. G{\o}tzsche and J.M. Grimshaw and T. Groves and M. Helfand and J. Higgins and T. Lasserson and J. Lau and K. Lohr and J. McGowan and C. Mulrow and M. Norton and M. Page and M. Sampson and H. Sch{\"u}nemann and I. Simera and W. Summerskill and J. Tetzlaff and T.A. Trikalinos and D. Tovey and L. Turner and E. Whitlock",

note = "Cited By :137 Export Date: 26 July 2021",

year = "2016",

month = feb,

day = "18",

doi = "10.1186/2046-4053-4-1",

language = "Spanish",

volume = "20",

pages = "148--160",

journal = "Revista Espanola de Nutricion Humana y Dietetica",

issn = "2174-5145",

publisher = "Asociacion Espanola de Dietistas-Nutricionistas",

number = "2",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Ítems de referencia para publicar Protocolos de Revisiones Sistemáticas y Metaanálisis: Declaración PRISMA-P 2015

AU - PRISMA-P Group

AU - Moher, D.

AU - Shamseer, L.

AU - Clarke, M.

AU - Ghersi, D.

AU - Liberati, A.

AU - Petticrew, M.

AU - Shekelle, P.

AU - Stewart, L.A.

AU - Estarli, M.

AU - Barrera, E.S.A.

AU - Martínez-Rodríguez, R.

AU - Baladia, E.

AU - Agüero, S.D.

AU - Camacho, S.

AU - Buhring, K.

AU - Herrero-López, A.

AU - Gil-González, D.M.

AU - Altman, D.G.

AU - Booth, A.

AU - Chan, A.-W.

AU - Chang, S.

AU - Clifford, T.

AU - Dickersin, K.

AU - Egger, M.

AU - Gøtzsche, P.C.

AU - Grimshaw, J.M.

AU - Groves, T.

AU - Helfand, M.

AU - Higgins, J.

AU - Lasserson, T.

AU - Lau, J.

AU - Lohr, K.

AU - McGowan, J.

AU - Mulrow, C.

AU - Norton, M.

AU - Page, M.

AU - Sampson, M.

AU - Schünemann, H.

AU - Simera, I.

AU - Summerskill, W.

AU - Tetzlaff, J.

AU - Trikalinos, T.A.

AU - Tovey, D.

AU - Turner, L.

AU - Whitlock, E.

N1 - Cited By :137 Export Date: 26 July 2021

PY - 2016/2/18

Y1 - 2016/2/18

N2 - Systematic reviews should build on a protocol that describes the rationale, hypothesis, and planned methods of the review; few reviews report whether a protocol exists. Detailed, well-described protocols can facilitate the understanding and appraisal of the review methods, as well as the detection of modifications to methods and selective reporting in completed reviews. We describe the development of a reporting guideline, the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-Analyses for Protocols 2015 (PRISMA-P 2015). PRISMA-P consists of a 17-item checklist intended to facilitate the preparation and reporting of a robust protocol for the systematic review. Funders and those commissioning reviews might consider mandating the use of the checklist to facilitate the submission of relevant protocol information in funding applications. Similarly, peer reviewers and editors can use the guidance to gauge the completeness and transparency of a systematic review protocol submitted for publication in a journal or other medium.

AB - Systematic reviews should build on a protocol that describes the rationale, hypothesis, and planned methods of the review; few reviews report whether a protocol exists. Detailed, well-described protocols can facilitate the understanding and appraisal of the review methods, as well as the detection of modifications to methods and selective reporting in completed reviews. We describe the development of a reporting guideline, the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-Analyses for Protocols 2015 (PRISMA-P 2015). PRISMA-P consists of a 17-item checklist intended to facilitate the preparation and reporting of a robust protocol for the systematic review. Funders and those commissioning reviews might consider mandating the use of the checklist to facilitate the submission of relevant protocol information in funding applications. Similarly, peer reviewers and editors can use the guidance to gauge the completeness and transparency of a systematic review protocol submitted for publication in a journal or other medium.

U2 - 10.1186/2046-4053-4-1

DO - 10.1186/2046-4053-4-1

M3 - Article

SN - 2174-5145

VL - 20

SP - 148

EP - 160

JO - Revista Espanola de Nutricion Humana y Dietetica

JF - Revista Espanola de Nutricion Humana y Dietetica

IS - 2

ER -

Ítems de referencia para publicar Protocolos de Revisiones Sistemáticas y Metaanálisis: Declaración PRISMA-P 2015

Abstract

Bibliographical note

Access to Document

Fingerprint

Cite this