TY - JOUR
T1 - Ítems de referencia para publicar Protocolos de Revisiones Sistemáticas y Metaanálisis: Declaración PRISMA-P 2015
AU - PRISMA-P Group
AU - Moher, D.
AU - Shamseer, L.
AU - Clarke, M.
AU - Ghersi, D.
AU - Liberati, A.
AU - Petticrew, M.
AU - Shekelle, P.
AU - Stewart, L.A.
AU - Estarli, M.
AU - Barrera, E.S.A.
AU - Martínez-Rodríguez, R.
AU - Baladia, E.
AU - Agüero, S.D.
AU - Camacho, S.
AU - Buhring, K.
AU - Herrero-López, A.
AU - Gil-González, D.M.
AU - Altman, D.G.
AU - Booth, A.
AU - Chan, A.-W.
AU - Chang, S.
AU - Clifford, T.
AU - Dickersin, K.
AU - Egger, M.
AU - Gøtzsche, P.C.
AU - Grimshaw, J.M.
AU - Groves, T.
AU - Helfand, M.
AU - Higgins, J.
AU - Lasserson, T.
AU - Lau, J.
AU - Lohr, K.
AU - McGowan, J.
AU - Mulrow, C.
AU - Norton, M.
AU - Page, M.
AU - Sampson, M.
AU - Schünemann, H.
AU - Simera, I.
AU - Summerskill, W.
AU - Tetzlaff, J.
AU - Trikalinos, T.A.
AU - Tovey, D.
AU - Turner, L.
AU - Whitlock, E.
N1 - Cited By :137
Export Date: 26 July 2021
PY - 2016/2/18
Y1 - 2016/2/18
N2 - Systematic reviews should build on a protocol that describes the rationale, hypothesis, and planned methods of the review; few reviews report whether a protocol exists. Detailed, well-described protocols can facilitate the understanding and appraisal of the review methods, as well as the detection of modifications to methods and selective reporting in completed reviews. We describe the development of a reporting guideline, the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-Analyses for Protocols 2015 (PRISMA-P 2015). PRISMA-P consists of a 17-item checklist intended to facilitate the preparation and reporting of a robust protocol for the systematic review. Funders and those commissioning reviews might consider mandating the use of the checklist to facilitate the submission of relevant protocol information in funding applications. Similarly, peer reviewers and editors can use the guidance to gauge the completeness and transparency of a systematic review protocol submitted for publication in a journal or other medium.
AB - Systematic reviews should build on a protocol that describes the rationale, hypothesis, and planned methods of the review; few reviews report whether a protocol exists. Detailed, well-described protocols can facilitate the understanding and appraisal of the review methods, as well as the detection of modifications to methods and selective reporting in completed reviews. We describe the development of a reporting guideline, the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-Analyses for Protocols 2015 (PRISMA-P 2015). PRISMA-P consists of a 17-item checklist intended to facilitate the preparation and reporting of a robust protocol for the systematic review. Funders and those commissioning reviews might consider mandating the use of the checklist to facilitate the submission of relevant protocol information in funding applications. Similarly, peer reviewers and editors can use the guidance to gauge the completeness and transparency of a systematic review protocol submitted for publication in a journal or other medium.
U2 - 10.1186/2046-4053-4-1
DO - 10.1186/2046-4053-4-1
M3 - Article
SN - 2174-5145
VL - 20
SP - 148
EP - 160
JO - Revista Espanola de Nutricion Humana y Dietetica
JF - Revista Espanola de Nutricion Humana y Dietetica
IS - 2
ER -