Description
Human-carnivore coexistence (HCC) on agricultural lands affects wildlife and human communities around the world, whereby a lack of HCC is a central concern for conservation and farmer livelihoods alike. For intervention strategies aimed at facilitating HCC to achieve their desired goals it is essential to understand how interventions and their success are perceived by different stakeholders. Using a grounded theory approach, interviews (n=31) were conducted with key stakeholders (commercial livestock farmers, conservationists and protected area managers) involved in HCC scenarios in Limpopo, South Africa. Interviews explored perceptions of successful intervention strategies (aimed at increasing HCC), factors that contribute to perceptions of strategy effectiveness and whether coexistence was a concept that stakeholders considered achievable. The use of grounded theory emphasised the individual nature and previously unexplored facets to HCC experiences. The majority of stakeholders based their measures of success on changes in livestock loss. Concern has been raised over the subjectivity and reliance on recall that this measure involves, potentially reducing its reliability as an indicator of functional effectiveness. However, it was relied on heavily by users of HCC interventions in our study and is therefore likely influential in subsequent behaviour and decision-making regarding the intervention. Nonetheless, perceptions of success were not just shaped by livestock loss but influenced by various social, cultural, economic and political factors emphasising the challenges of defining and achieving HCC goals. Perceptions of coexistence varied; some stakeholders considered farmer-carnivore coexistence to be impossible, but most indicated it was feasible with certain caveats. An important element of inter-stakeholder misunderstanding became apparent, especially regarding the respective perceptions of coexistence and responsibility for its achievement. Without fully understanding these perceptions and their underpinning factors, interventions may be restricted in their capacity to meet the expectations of all interested parties. The study highlights the need to understand and explore the perceptions of all stakeholders when implementing intervention strategies in order to properly define and evaluate the achievement of HCC goals.Period | 19 Oct 2022 → 21 Oct 2022 |
---|---|
Event title | Pathways Europe 2022: Human Dimensions of Wildlife Conference and Training: Sharing Landscapes |
Event type | Conference |
Location | Wageningen, NetherlandsShow on map |
Degree of Recognition | International |
Keywords
- Human-Wildlife Conflict
- South Africa
- Rural Communities
- conservation evaluation
- stakeholder perception
- carnivore
- depredation
- livestock
- grounded theory
- mitigation
ASJC Scopus subject areas
- Agricultural and Biological Sciences(all)
- Psychology(all)
- Social Sciences(all)
Documents & Links
Related content
-
Research output
-
The Psychologists' Tree of Life: A Special Feature on Psychologists Working with Non-Human Animals. A Matter of Pride
Research output: Contribution to specialist publication › Article
-
Stakeholder Perceptions of Success in Human-Carnivore Coexistence Interventions
Research output: Contribution to journal › Article › peer-review
-
The Social Psychology of Human Wild Lion Conflict Mitigation: Attitudes & Behaviours in Rural Zimbabwe
Research output: Contribution to conference › Abstract › peer-review
-
Evaluation of the use of psychometric scales in human–wildlife interaction research to determine attitudes and tolerance toward wildlife
Research output: Contribution to journal › Article › peer-review
-
From Caves to the Savannah, the Mitogenome History of Modern Lions (Panthera leo) and Their Ancestors
Research output: Contribution to journal › Article › peer-review
-
Activities
-
Conservation of Wild Lions: Five Acre Farm
Activity: Talk or presentation › Invited talk
-
International Union for Conservation of Nature (External organisation)
Activity: Membership › Membership of network
-
African Lions, Threats, Conflict & Communities
Activity: Talk or presentation › Invited talk
-
African Lion Working Group (External organisation)
Activity: Membership › Membership of working group
-
Invited Talk: African Lions & Social Networks
Activity: Talk or presentation › Invited talk
-
Talk: African Lions: Threats, Networks, Conflict & Mitigation
Activity: Talk or presentation › Invited talk
-
Social Psychology of Conservation and the Environment
Activity: Participating in or organising an event › Public Engagement Event
-
Sustainability (Journal)
Activity: Publication peer-review and editorial work › Publication peer-review
-
Networks of Pride: Threats, Solutions and the Relevance of Psychology to Conserving African Lions
Activity: Talk or presentation › Invited talk
-
Invited Talk: African Lions & Mitigating Conflict
Activity: Talk or presentation › Invited talk
-
Conserving Lions: Threats, Solutions & Social Networks
Activity: Talk or presentation › Invited talk
-
Why Psychology is Fundamental for the Environmental Sustainability and Wildlife Conservation Agenda
Activity: Talk or presentation › Invited talk
-
Press/Media
-
Lateral Magazine: The Pride of Africa
Press/Media: Expert Comment
-
Inside Track: taking steps towards a future for the African lion
Press/Media: Expert Comment
-
Big Cats Wild Cats
Press/Media: Research
-
Human-Wildlife Conflict Mitigation in Zimbabwe
Press/Media: Research